Rice v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner satisfied his burden at step one “because the prosecutor proceeded to step two of Batson before the trial court made a ruling at step one” and proceeding to consider steps two and three
• stating that “[p]etitioner's claim was adjudicated on the merits in state court” given that Petitioner had a trial and was convicted.
• addressing argument that peremptory strike, considered in context with two prior strikes, violated Batson, without commenting on timeliness of the objection
• granting habeas where trial court allowed a Batson violation to go uncured
• “It is well settled that we may review de novo an exhausted federal claim that was not adjudicated on the merits in state court.”
• “It is not enough that Petitioner show an unreasonable determination of fact under § 2254(d)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).