Maxwell v. Lucky Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party met its burden of authentication because two witnesses “identified the tape and listened to it, testifying that the tape was a fair and accurate recordation of the conversation they held with defendant”
• it was error for the trial court to refuse to conduct review in camera of the witness' statements in the possession of the prosecutor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).