Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,929 Theodore B. Wessel v. L. M. Buhler and N. A. Jordan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to district court for determination of prejudgment interest in a Rule 10b-5 case because of defendant’s “flagrant use of false statements.”
• interpreting Rule 10b-5 as prohibiting only “omission[s] occurring as part of an affirmative statement”
• “Of course, the jury could have disbelieved the denials, but disbelief does not become a substitute for affirmative evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).