Matusiak v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that speech “related to the competency of ... management as well as the efficient performance of [government] duties” addressed a matter of public concern
• noting that speech \related to the competency of ... management as well as the efficient performance of [government] duties\ addressed a matter of public concern
• finding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion despite possible inconvenience to witnesses because transfer would have led to delay
• noting that the fact that the plaintiffs “conduct might have justified an adverse employment decision, including a transfer, does not [alone] suffice” to relieve a defendant of liability
• noting that speech “related to the competency of . . . management as well as the efficient performance of [government] duties” addressed a matter of public concern
• reversing grant of summary judgment for employer because the plaintiff produced evidence that his employer knew of his speech as well as evidence that his employer told co-workers that the plaintiff should be removed because he expressed his opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).