Skip to main content
· 3/3/1994

Matthews v. Wozencraft

Citations

  • 15 F.3d 432
  • 22 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1385
  • 30 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1025
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3855
  • 1994 WL 45170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, under Texas law, appropriation claims cannot involve a defendant who appropriates a plaintiffs name in an incidental manner, or for a newsworthy purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Smith, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.