Express One International, Inc. v. Steinbeck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the economic loss rule barred a negligence claim by an employer against a former employee for litigation-related costs it incurred because of a statement posted by the former employee on an internet bulletin board
• holding that the economic loss rule barred a negligence claim by an employer against a former employee for litigation-related costs it incurred because of a statement posted by the former employee on an internet bulletin board
• holding that the economic loss rule barred a negligence claim by an employer against a former employee for litigation-related costs it incurred because of a statement posted by the former employee on an internet bulletin board
• holding that the economic loss rule barred 30 a negligence claim by an employer against a former employee for litigation-related costs it incurred because of a statement posted by the former employee on an internet bulletin board
• holding that the economic loss rule barred 29 a negligence claim by an employer against a former employee for litigation-related costs it incurred because of a statement posted by the former employee on an internet bulletin board
• concluding claimant produced no evidence defendant appropriated a particular name for the defendant’s own benefit because of any value associated with the name

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).