Matthews v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that informing the jury that the law presumes that an individual intends the consequences of his act was fundamentally erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clark v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-05-18· cited 41×
• Chris D. Hawkins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-04-18· cited 6×
• Lampkins v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-04· cited 4×
• Billy Brantley v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 2×
• Judy Kirby v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-10

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Sandstrom v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
• Yates v. Evatt
  Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 932×
• Brown v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-03-02· cited 97×
• Cuto v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-04-21· cited 28×
• Reid v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-11-02· cited 23×
• Darby v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-11-06· cited 22×
• Walker v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-04-08· cited 7×