Skip to main content

Matthews v. State

Citations

  • 897 So. 2d 523
  • 2005 WL 475347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant must be resen-tenced because it was unclear whether the trial court would have imposed the same sentence absent the most serious charges for violation of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cope, Ramirez, and Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.