Skip to main content

Adams v. State

Citations

  • 521 So. 2d 337
  • 1988 WL 18691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing where defendant's probation was revoked based solely on testimony of intake officer who relied on probation department's records which were never admitted into evidence
  • public records are inadmissible without a proper foundation for their introduction, even when referred to at trial by public officer
  • probation revocation reversed when based solely on probation officer's hearsay testimony concerning her review of the probation department records, which records were never introduced in evidence
  • probation officer’s testimony based on review of probation department’s records was insufficient to sustain revocation order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.