Skip to main content

Matthews v. Rodgers

Citations

  • 651 S.W.2d 453
  • 279 Ark. 328
  • 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court could properly consider future medical expenses where only the past medical expenses were certain, a doctor testified that appellee might need future medical procedures, and appellee testified he still had pain in the area
  • “The doctor testified that the appellee might need future medical procedures. The appellee testified he still had pain in the area. This was sufficient for the court to consider this element of damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.