Skip to main content
· 12/22/1999

Carmical v. McAfee

Citations

  • 7 S.W.3d 350
  • 68 Ark. App. 313
  • 1999 Ark. App. LEXIS 840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implying party appealing under § 14-56-425 may raise new issues on appeal
  • “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, we determine legislative intent from the ordinary meaning of the language used.”
  • “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, we determine legislative intent from the ordinary meaning of the language used.”
  • “Where the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, we determine legislative intent from the ordinary meaning of the language used.”
  • “Proof that a litigant filed a vexatious lawsuit is not sufficient by itself to prove that the litigant committed abuse of process because there must also be proof of a specific abusive use of process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Josephine Linker Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.