Supreme Court of Virginia· 6/13/1955
Matthews v. Hicks, Adm'r.
Citations
- 197 Va. 112
- 87 S.E.2d 629
- 1955 Va. LEXIS 202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying precursor of current statutory definition of damages for wrongful death
- damages in wrongful death action, which may be brought for benefit of decedent’s children, may include ‘‘loss of deceased’s care, attention and society’’
- where the surviving wife had deserted the decedent and lived in adultery for two years, but returned to him over weekends about two weeks before his death
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court· 1983-04-27· cited 318×
- Bedgood v. MadalinTexas Supreme Court· 1980-06-04· cited 72×
- Maroulis v. ElliottSupreme Court of Virginia· 1966-11-28· cited 55×
- Wilson v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1967-04-24· cited 54×
- Litchford v. HancockSupreme Court of Virginia· 1987-01-16· cited 45×
- Basham v. Terry, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia· 1958-03-10· cited 42×
- City of Tucson v. WondergemArizona Supreme Court· 1970-03-09· cited 34×
- Gough v. ShanerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1955-11-28· cited 33×
- Cavanaugh v. JepsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-05-06· cited 27×
- Stamper v. BannisterWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1961-02-14· cited 24×
- Weller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-08-10· cited 23×
- Marshall v. GoughnourSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-08-28· cited 20×
- St. Clair v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Second Circuit· 1962-04-24· cited 19×
- Russell v. HammondSupreme Court of Virginia· 1959-01-26· cited 17×
- Pugh v. YearoutSupreme Court of Virginia· 1972-01-17· cited 16×
- Portsmouth Transit Company v. BrickhouseSupreme Court of Virginia· 1959-05-04· cited 15×
- Sawyer v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 1978-11-20· cited 15×
- ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1960-11-28· cited 13×
- Carroll v. SneedSupreme Court of Virginia· 1971-03-08· cited 13×
- Richmond Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia· 1962-12-03· cited 13×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Butler v. ParrochaSupreme Court of Virginia· 1947-06-09· cited 34×
- Nehi Bottling Company v. LambertSupreme Court of Virginia· 1955-03-07· cited 33×
- Yellow Cab Co. of Virginia, Inc. v. GulleySupreme Court of Virginia· 1938-01-13· cited 30×
- Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia· 1948-01-12· cited 29×
- Simmons & Winch v. McConnellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1890-02-13· cited 22×
- Poole v. KelleySupreme Court of Virginia· 1934-03-22· cited 22×
- Sink v. MastersonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1950-11-27· cited 20×
- Ratcliffe v. McDonald's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia· 1918-11-14· cited 18×
- Withrow v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1943-04-26· cited 16×
- City of Danville v. HowardSupreme Court of Virginia· 1931-03-19· cited 12×
- Crawford v. HiteSupreme Court of Virginia· 1940-09-05· cited 11×
- Leo Butler Co. v. WilbunSupreme Court of Virginia· 1951-05-07· cited 10×
- Porter v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1944-09-06· cited 10×
- Wolfe v. LockhartSupreme Court of Virginia· 1953-11-30· cited 9×
- Via v. BadanesSupreme Court of Virginia· 1949-03-07· cited 8×
- Harris v. RoyerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1935-11-14· cited 7×
- Chick Transit Corp. v. EdentonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1938-04-28· cited 7×
- Stillman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1943-10-11· cited 5×
- Virginia Public Service Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia· 1937-03-11· cited 3×
- Mitchell v. KennedySupreme Court of Virginia· 1936-06-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.