Supreme Court of Virginia· 4/24/1967
Wilson v. Whittaker
Citations
- 154 S.E.2d 124
- 207 Va. 1032
- 1967 Va. LEXIS 174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ordering new trial where trial court improperly allowed recovery of punitive damages and admitted irrelevant evidence
- reciting the accepted principle that \in an action for wrongful death the personal representative of the deceased sues primarily as trustee for certain statutory beneficiaries and not for the general benefit of the decedent's estate\
- reciting the accepted principle that “in an action for wrongful death the personal representative of the deceased sues primarily as trustee for certain statutory beneficiaries and not for the general benefit of the decedent’s estate”
- since purpose of statute not to punish wrongdoers, punitive damages could not be assessed
- “damages may be awarded not only for the pecuniary loss sustained by the statutory beneficiaries (including the probáble earnings of the deceased for the duration of his life expectancy in view of his health, age, business capacity, and experience
- listing a decedent’s personal representative as a type of fiduciary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eggleston, Buchanan, Snead, I'Anson, Carrico, Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnny Overstreet, Administrator of the Estate of David Wilkey, Deceased v. Kentucky Central Life Insurance CompanyFourth Circuit· 1991-12-04· cited 120×
- Semler v. Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D. C., Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1978-03-28· cited 83×
- Gavica v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-03-06· cited 79×
- Stutsman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-07-14· cited 73×
- Jones, Mabel S. v. Prince George CtyD.C. Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 66×
- Lawrence v. Craven Tire Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1969-09-05· cited 54×
- In Re Air Crash Disaster at Washington, D.C. on January 13, 1982District of Columbia· 1983-03-03· cited 50×
- Dammarell v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict of Columbia· 2005-12-14· cited 48×
- Cassady v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-04-18· cited 41×
- Kone v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia· 2006-06-08· cited 34×
- Horn v. AbernathySupreme Court of Virginia· 1986-04-25· cited 34×
- Andis v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-02-18· cited 28×
- Van Fossen v. United StatesN.D. California· 1977-06-08· cited 21×
- Marshall v. GoughnourSupreme Court of Virginia· 1980-08-28· cited 20×
- O'CONNOR v. Several Unknown Correctional OfficersE.D. Virginia· 1981-10-15· cited 18×
- Rice v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia· 2000-06-09· cited 16×
- Charles B. Beverage, Jr., Administrator of the Estate of Gwendolyn Hicks, Deceased v. Fred Douglas HarveyFourth Circuit· 1979-07-31· cited 15×
- Sawyer v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 1978-11-20· cited 15×
- Hewitt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.E.D. Virginia· 1980-06-10· cited 12×
- In Re TignorE.D. Virginia· 1982-06-24· cited 12×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matthews v. Hicks, Adm'r.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1955-06-13· cited 48×
- Ellis B. Grady, Jr., Administrator, C.T.A., of Margarette W. Rodgers, Deceased v. Richard Eugene IrvineFourth Circuit· 1958-04-08· cited 39×
- Eubank v. SpencerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1962-12-03· cited 30×
- Ralph Seymour & Burford Buick Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1953-03-09· cited 29×
- Ruebush v. FunkFourth Circuit· 1933-01-10· cited 24×
- Conrad v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1954-03-15· cited 17×
- Atlantic Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. KeeseeD.C. Circuit· 1940-03-11· cited 15×
- Hudson Motor Car Co. v. HertzSixth Circuit· 1941-06-25· cited 9×
- Mercer v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia· 1929-06-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.