Matthew Greene v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaching a result different from Gay and noting that “[t]he plan under which the project under consideration in the [Gay ] case was constructed and operated was developed under the then existing Federal statute” and “[t]hat statute has been materially changed”
• exemption limited to materials physically incorporated in buildings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).