Ninth Circuit· 7/14/2020
Matthew Greene v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Citations
- 965 F.3d 767
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that it is “reasonable to assume plaintiff’s counsel would seek 20 fees equal to 25% of possible compensatory and punitive damages”
- holding 22 a defendant does not need to show that punitive damages are “more likely than not,” but 23 that they are merely “possible”
- explaining that a defendant may satisfy “the amount-in-controversy 28 requirement under CAFA if it is reasonably possible that it may be liable for the 1 proffered punitive damages amount”
- “‘Amount at stake’ does not mean likely or probable liability; 19 rather, it refers to possible liability.”
- defendant provided evidence of attorneys’ fees 3 sought by plaintiff’s counsel in prior similar cases
- “[T]he amount in controversy represents only the ‘amount at stake in the underlying litigation,’ not the likely liability.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Levone Harris v. Km Industrial, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2020-11-13· cited 214×
- Griselda Jauregui v. Roadrunner Transportation ServNinth Circuit· 2022-03-17· cited 154×
- Clayton Salter v. Quality Carriers, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2020-09-08· cited 132×
- Brandon Moe v. Geico Indemnity CompanyNinth Circuit· 2023-07-12· cited 43×
- Noelle Lee v. Robert FisherNinth Circuit· 2023-06-01· cited 24×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2015-01-08· cited 822×
- Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzNinth Circuit· 2018-08-08· cited 623×
- Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v. Estate of LhotkaNinth Circuit· 2010-03-31· cited 618×
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court· 2013-03-19· cited 509×
- Elsa Chavez v. Jpmorgan Chase BankNinth Circuit· 2018-04-20· cited 429×
- Blanca Argelia Arias v. Residence Inn by MarriottNinth Circuit· 2019-09-03· cited 415×
- China Agritech, Inc. v. ReshSupreme Court· 2018-06-11· cited 228×
- Travis Gonzales v. Carmax Auto Superstores, LLCNinth Circuit· 2016-10-20· cited 220×
- Patrick Lacross v. Knight Transportation IncNinth Circuit· 2015-01-08· cited 137×
- Robert J. Pachinger v. Mgm Grand Hotel-Las Vegas, Inc., and Does I Through V, InclusiveNinth Circuit· 1986-10-15· cited 99×
- Judon v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaThird Circuit· 2014-12-12· cited 98×
- Frederick v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceTenth Circuit· 2012-06-28· cited 75×
- Fierro v. Landry's Rest. Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-02-15· cited 55×
- Diane M. Hendricks Kenneth A. Hendricks v. Bank of America, N.A., and Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda), Ltd., a Bermuda CorporationNinth Circuit· 2005-05-24· cited 39×
- Massage Envy Franchising v. Mark PirozziEighth Circuit· 2019-09-17· cited 21×
- Keeling v. Esurance InsuranceSeventh Circuit· 2011-09-26· cited 19×
- Morris v. Hotel Riviera, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1983-04-26· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.