Keeling v. Esurance Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a multiplier of five for a case under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act was improbable, but not “legally impossible”
• “We therefore do not think it is ‘legally impossible’ for the class to recover more than $3 million in punitive damages. Improbable, perhaps, but not impossible.”
• “Suppose it were to comply with an injunction by eliminating this coverage and its premium. Its current profit on this coverage in Illinois is about $125,000 a year. The present value of foregoing this stream of profits is about $1.5 million.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).