S.D. New York· 11/14/2006
Mattera v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
Citations
- 239 F.R.D. 70
- 2006 WL 3316967
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82928
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant that employed and paid most of plaintiff class was “significant defendant” because it would be responsible for most of relief sought: payment of unlawfully withheld wages
- finding it \reasonably likely that more than two-thirds of the putative class members of the proposed class — all of whom work in New York — are citizens of New York.\
- finding absent defendant qualified as indispensable because [absent defendant] would undoubtedly be prejudiced if a judgment is rendered in this action in its absence, given that the complaint is directed towards [absent defendant]'s own compensation structure and policies.”
- considering affidavits provided by both parties in resolving a CAFA matter
- absentee owner-employer was a necessary party where complaint sought class-wide injunctive and declaratory relief from the owner of the workplace, even if ownership had changed
- “It is difficult to see how [plaintiff] could be accorded complete relief without [absent party], the entity that employs and, moreover, pays and makes charge backs to the wages of, members of the putative class.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Avraham Gold v. New York Life Insurance Co.Second Circuit· 2013-09-18· cited 85×
- Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.E.D. New York· 2016-02-24· cited 39×
- Hart v. Rick's NY Cabaret International, Inc.S.D. New York· 2014-01-28· cited 16×
- Sorrentino v. ASN Roosevelt Center, LLCE.D. New York· 2008-12-01· cited 14×
- In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc.S.D. New York· 2014-08-11· cited 14×
- Romano v. SLS Residential, Inc.S.D. New York· 2011-06-22· cited 9×
- Kurovskaya v. Project O.H.R., Inc.S.D. New York· 2017-04-13· cited 9×
- Ellis v. Montgomery CountyE.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-01-27· cited 7×
- Richins v. Hofstra UniversityE.D. New York· 2012-12-10· cited 7×
- Spread Enterprises, Inc. v. First Data Merchant Services Corp.E.D. New York· 2014-02-22· cited 7×
- Lucker v. Bayside CemeteryE.D. New York· 2009-09-30· cited 6×
- Ava Acupuncture P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceS.D. New York· 2008-12-09· cited 5×
- Ventimiglia v. Tishman Speyer Archstone-Smith Westbury, L.P.E.D. New York· 2008-11-28· cited 4×
- American General Financial Services v. GriffinN.D. Ohio· 2010-02-17· cited 3×
- Dutcher v. MathesonD. Utah· 2014-04-25· cited 2×
- Kairy v. Supershuttle International, Inc.N.D. California· 2009-12-22· cited 1×
- Ventimiglia v. TISHMAN SPEYER ARCHSTONE-SMITHE.D. New York· 2008-11-28
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2000-01-12· cited 2,790×
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1968-01-29· cited 1,299×
- Carol Aurecchione v. Schoolman Transportation System, Inc., Classic Coach and Bill Schoolman, Docket No. 04-0561-CvSecond Circuit· 2005-10-17· cited 517×
- Louis Carter v. Dutchess Community CollegeSecond Circuit· 1984-05-14· cited 401×
- Zheng v. Liberty Apparel Company Inc.Second Circuit· 2003-12-30· cited 386×
- Hart v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2006-08-09· cited 214×
- Isaiah Evans v. Walter IndustriesEleventh Circuit· 2006-05-22· cited 176×
- Conntech Development Company v. University of Connecticut Education Properties, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-12-19· cited 153×
- Associated Dry Goods Corporation v. Towers Financial CorporationSecond Circuit· 1990-12-12· cited 91×
- Bayway Refining Company, Tosco Corporation, Counter v. Oxygenated Marketing and Trading A.G., CounterSecond Circuit· 2000-06-08· cited 88×
- Frazier v. Pioneer Americas LLCFifth Circuit· 2006-07-06· cited 79×
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn LoebS.D. New York· 1991-06-04· cited 46×
- Holland v. Fahnestock & Co.S.D. New York· 2002-10-15· cited 24×
- Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe v. CollierTenth Circuit· 1994-02-25· cited 22×
- Lao v. Wickes Furniture Co., Inc.C.D. California· 2006-10-04· cited 8×
- Eakins v. PELLA CORPORATIONE.D. North Carolina· 2006-09-27· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.