Arizona Supreme Court· 2/11/1993
Matter of Wolfram
Citations
- 847 P.2d 94
- 174 Ariz. 49
- 132 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1993 Ariz. LEXIS 10
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a trial court’s finding of ineffective assistance of counsel in a Rule 32 proceeding does not \necessarily equate” to a finding of \a violation of our ethical rules”
- “In disciplinary proceedings, this [C]ourt acts as an independent trier of fact and law in the exercise of our supervisory responsibility over the State Bar.”
- “We note and consider that these violations occurred in the course of representation in a very serious criminal matter. What might be excusable in handling a traffic violation is not to be tolerated in a charge such as this.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Corcoran, Martone, Moeller, Zlaket
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.