In Re Zawada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• increasing suspension from six months to six months and one day for prosecutor who intentionally deprived defendants of fair trials in two cases
• finding a prosecutor’s appeals to the jury’s fear; disrespect for, prejudice against, and harassment of expert witnesses; and improper arguments were knowing, deliberate, and “clearly gross misconduct”
• “[A] prosecutor cannot attack [an] expert with non-evidence, using irrelevant, insulting cross- examination and baseless argument designed to mislead the jury.”
• “[A] prosecutor cannot attack [an] expert with non-evidence, using irrelevant, insulting cross- examination and baseless argument designed to mislead the jury.”
• prosecutor committed same type of misconduct in two cases separated by years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).