Matheson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an objection that the State has shown no subsequent probation violations and that the court has revoked probation without a hearing is sufficient to implicate a denial of due process.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tapia, Gilbert Jr.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-13· cited 113×
• Trifovesti v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-10-11· cited 4×
• Derrick Payton v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2004-08-16
• Gilbert Tapia Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-05-01
• Gilbert Tapia Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-01-09

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rogers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-20· cited 244×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-20· cited 49×
• Hise v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-10-20· cited 15×
• Matheson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-08-15· cited 6×