Skip to main content
· 10/26/2005

Mata v. Schoch

Citations

  • 337 B.R. 138
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38730
  • 2005 WL 3441225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that a judgment, order, or proceeding must be final and not interlocutory to merit consideration under Rule 60(b)
  • recognizing removal of state court lawsuit as an informal proof of claim in debtor's Chapter 11 proceeding
  • \[T]he removal of Plaintiffs' state court claim constitutes a filing of Plaintiffs' complaint in satisfaction of the fourth element of Nikoloutsos because the complaint was filed as part of the Debtor's Notice of Removal of an Adversary Proceeding.\
  • refusing reconsideration where no new evidence was presented
  • refusing reconsideration where no new evidence was presented
  • refusing reconsideration where no new evidence was presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.