New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment order that did not dispose of counterclaim for attorneys' fees under the DTPA was not final and appealable
• holding that appellate court’s assumption of jurisdiction over interlocutory order when not expressly authorized by statute is fundamental jurisdictional error
• concluding that the Court of Appeals erred by assuming jurisdiction over an appeal in which the defendant’s counterclaim for attorney’s fees remained pending
• holding that summary judgment order that did not dispose of counterclaim for attorneys = fees under the DTPA was not final and appealable
• holding that appellate court’s assumption of jurisdiction over interlocutory order when not expressly authorized to do so by statute is fundamental jurisdictional error
• holding that claim for attorney fees omitted from summary judgment motion remained pending so that order granting motion was interlocutory and not appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).