Skip to main content
· 7/2/2009

Massey v. Hrostek

Citations

  • 2009 VT 70
  • 980 A.2d 768
  • 186 Vt. 211
  • 2009 Vt. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Our law establishes a rebuttable presumption that the act oftitling property in another's name establishes intent to convey a present interest in the property.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reiber, Dooley, Johnson, Skoglund, Burgess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.