Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 10/4/1957
Massey v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 305 S.W.2d 755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is not more necessary to describe a car on the premises than it would be to describe any other item of personal property in which the liquor might be stored”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-04-22· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. SignorineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-03-22· cited 46×
- State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-07-26· cited 26×
- Korreckt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1987-05-12· cited 25×
- Peacock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-09-07· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. EckertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-12-15· cited 18×
- State v. SalasNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-15· cited 7×
- People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-03-19· cited 3×
- McCissell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1957-10-04· cited 3×
- Evans v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2003-08-29· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. CherepkoMonroe County Court of Common Pleas· 1985-12-30
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.