Massengale v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting the appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in imposing the mandatory $100 cost of prosecution pursuant to the 2008 version of section 938.27(8) because the appellant’s offenses were committed before the amendment’s effective date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sims v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-08· cited 1×
• Eric Michael Crapser v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-22

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Straub v. LEHTINEN, VARGAS & RIEDI, PA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-19· cited 4×
• Holloman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-09· cited 1×