Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Keydata Corp. (In Re Keydata Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “what is required is that the utility be protected from an unreasonable risk of non-payment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Booth
  D. Utah· 1982-04-13· cited 93×
• Begley v. Philadelphia Electric Co. (In Re Begley)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-06-11· cited 18×
• In Re Caldor, Inc.-NY
  S.D. New York· 1996-07-10· cited 15×
• Marion Steel Co. v. Ohio Edison Co. (In Re Marion Steel Co.)
  N.D. Ohio· 1983-10-17· cited 15×
• Hennen v. Dayton Power & Light Co. (In Re Hennen)
  S.D. Ohio· 1982-02-17· cited 14×
• In Re Utica Floor Maintenance, Inc.
  N.D. New York· 1982-12-21· cited 13×
• Kiriluk v. Chester Water Authority (In Re Kiriluk)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-09-04· cited 8×
• Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. Elliott Leases Cars, Inc. (In Re Elliott Leases Cars, Inc.)
  D. Rhode Island· 1982-06-11· cited 5×
• In Re Adelphia Business Solutions, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2002-06-25· cited 5×
• Steinebach v. Tucson Electric Power Co. (In Re Steinebach)
  D. Arizona· 2004-01-02· cited 4×
• Hanratty v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-11-15· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Cunha (In Re Cunha)
  E.D. Virginia· 1979-11-27· cited 9×