· 10/17/1983
Marion Steel Co. v. Ohio Edison Co. (In Re Marion Steel Co.)
Citations
- 35 B.R. 188
- 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5229
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that administrative expense priority may alone constitute \adequate assurance of payment\ under § 366(b)
- noting that administrative expense priority may alone constitute “adequate assurance of payment” under § 366(b)
- once 20 day period has passed the utility is in the driver’s seat and may discontinue service as it sees fit
- utility denied super-priority status and immediate right of termination upon any subsequent delinquency and required to accept as assurance about one week’s deposit, even though the debtor’s monthly bill was about $650,000.00
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walter J. Krasniewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.