Skip to main content
· 1/26/2006

MARYCLE, LLC. v. First Choice Internet, Inc.

Citations

  • 890 A.2d 818
  • 166 Md. App. 481
  • 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that marketing company that sent unsolicited “spam” emails to residents of Maryland and other states could reasonably be 60 expected to answer for those emails in Maryland or any other state to which they were sent
  • reasoning that marketing company that sent unsolicited “spam” emails to residents of Maryland and other states could reasonably be 60 expected to answer for those emails in Maryland or any other state to which they were sent
  • ‘‘officers and agents of a corporation or limited liability company may be held person- ally liable for [violations of Maryland Consumer Protection Act] when they direct, participate in, or cooperate in the prohibited conduct’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salmon, Adkins, Barbera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.