Skip to main content
· 5/20/2014

Mary Lowe v. Susan Hill

Citations

  • 430 S.W.3d 346
  • 2014 WL 2054281
  • 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] Plaintiff cannot recover under an equitable theory when she has entered into an express contract for the very subject matter for which she seeks to recover.”
  • “a plaintiff cannot recover under an equitable theory when she has entered into an express contract for the very subject matter for which she seeks to recover’’
  • “[A] plaintiff cannot recover under an equitable theory when she has entered into an express contract for the very subject matter for which she seeks to recover.”
  • “Claims for money had and received and unjust enrichment are both founded upon equitable principles whereby the law implies a contract [referred to as quasi-contract] to prevent unjust enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Witt, Hardwick, Ahuja

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.