Skip to main content
· 4/13/2010

Pitman v. City of Columbia

Citations

  • 309 S.W.3d 395
  • 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 441
  • 2010 WL 1439021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the measure of recovery in an unjust enrichment action is not the actual amount of the enrichment, but the amount of the enrichment that would be unjust for one party to retain
  • “[P]ossession of information necessary to determine that payment is mistaken does not constitute voluntary payment made with full knowledge of the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis, Howard, Witt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.