Skip to main content
· 12/14/1981

Marvin Morris v. Harold Ross

Citations

  • 663 F.2d 1032
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where non-movant responds with nothing “more than a repetition of his conclusional allegations, summary judgment for the defendant was not only proper but required”
  • in such cases, summary judgment in favor of the movant is “not only proper but required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Vance, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.