Lebrecht v. Tuli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that generally it is improper to comment on an opponent’s failure to call a witness that is not under their control
• “Here, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants. It did not reach the damages issue; therefore, the issue is not pertinent to [this] appeal”
• where domestic circumstance of party in personal injury action is relevant, it is admissible
• where domestic circumstance of party in personal injury action is relevant, it is admissible
• “an attorney may argue the evidence and reasonable inferences from it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).