Martin v. TWP Enterprises Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the transfer of 12 “instrumental” employees from the predecessor corporation to the successor can be an indicia of 13 continuation
• holding that “the ‘mere continuation’ 14 exception [does] not apply . . . where there [is] no evidence of fraudulent purpose or inadequate 15 consideration” and the acquiring company assumed part of the acquiree’s liabilities
• including adequacy of consideration as one of the five factors in a “mere continuity” analysis
• stating 10 that Maryland courts “assess[] the adequacy of consideration as a factor and consistently f[ind] 11 the exception [does] not apply where consideration was adequate”
• applying successor liability to a transfer of assets involving an LLC
• specifying that consideration must be adequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).