Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 774 N.E.2d 43
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 672
  • 2002 WL 1978870

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stressing that retroactive application is not appropriate if it would violate “a vested right or constitutional guarant[ee]”
  • retroactive application where a legislative amendment was an ap- parent corrective to a judicial decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.