Skip to main content
· 10/29/2002

Powdertech, Inc. v. Joganic

Citations

  • 776 N.E.2d 1251
  • 13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1276
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1762
  • 2002 WL 31420105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the firing of a employee pursuant to disciplinary process does not constitute extreme and outrageous conduct
  • recognizing the difference between company’s alcohol policy violations and discipline policy violations
  • recognizing the difference between company's alcohol policy violations and discipline policy violations
  • \[T]he issue of pretext does not address the correctness or desirability of reasons offered for employment decisions.\
  • Here, [the plaintiff’s] claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress fails as a matter of law because [the defendant’s] act of firing him pursuant to its disciplinary policy does not constitute extreme and outrageous conduct.”
  • listing first two prongs of prima facie test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Friedlander, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.