· 10/29/2002
Powdertech, Inc. v. Joganic
Citations
- 776 N.E.2d 1251
- 13 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1276
- 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1762
- 2002 WL 31420105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the firing of a employee pursuant to disciplinary process does not constitute extreme and outrageous conduct
- recognizing the difference between company’s alcohol policy violations and discipline policy violations
- recognizing the difference between company's alcohol policy violations and discipline policy violations
- \[T]he issue of pretext does not address the correctness or desirability of reasons offered for employment decisions.\
- Here, [the plaintiff’s] claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress fails as a matter of law because [the defendant’s] act of firing him pursuant to its disciplinary policy does not constitute extreme and outrageous conduct.”
- listing first two prongs of prima facie test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharpnack, Friedlander, Najam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.