Martin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that notice of outcry was sufficient even though the typed notice did not contain the victim’s name because the victim’s handwritten statement was attached
• holding that notice of outcry was sufficient even though the typed notice did not contain the victim = s name because the victim = s handwritten statement was attached
• counsel’s affidavit stating what a juror told him in 5 support of motion for new trial based on alleged juror misconduct was inadmissible hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edwards v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-05-02· cited 29×
• Grant v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-08-05· cited 14×
• William Claude Mead v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2007-05-17
• Donald Ray Trowbridge v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-07-02
• Federico Daniel Garcia v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-04-25
• Orlando T. Morales v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-11-08
• Kiheem Grant v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-08-05
• Asa Asuncion v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2019-08-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rose v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-06-15· cited 647×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-14· cited 21×