Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 823 S.W.2d 391
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 115
  • 1992 WL 3675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice of outcry was sufficient even though the typed notice did not contain the victim’s name because the victim’s handwritten statement was attached
  • holding that notice of outcry was sufficient even though the typed notice did not contain the victim = s name because the victim = s handwritten statement was attached

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Bleil, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.