Martin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where defendant convicted of securities fraud against three identified investors, trial court properly ordered restitution to other investors, based on evidence that defendant also committed fraud against them
• where defendant convicted of securities fraud against three identified investors, trial court properly ordered restitution to other investors, based on evidence that defendant also committed fraud against them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-30· cited 112×
• Connor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-08· cited 48×
• LaFleur v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1993-01-28· cited 10×
• Connor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-05· cited 9×
• Housing Authority, City of Edgewood v. Sanders
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1985-04-18· cited 7×
• James Augustus Connor v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-12-07
• James Augustus Connor v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-02-13