Martin v. Smith
Citations
- 11 S.D. 437
- 78 N.W. 1001
- 1899 S.D. LEXIS 37
Syllabus
<p>1. Appeal does not lie from an order or judgment till it is actually entered; and there is no authority for directing entry thereof nmic pro tunc, after the appeal is taken, to render the appeal effectual, under Comp. Laws, § 5235. , , ,,</p> <p>2. Under Comp. Laws, § 5216, providing that appeal must be taken “within two years after the judgment shall be perfected, by filing the judgment roll,” appeal cannot be taken from judgment before such filing.</p>
Judges: Haney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Turlay v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court· 1971-09-10· cited 33×
- Stark v. Heart River Irrigation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1951-08-23· cited 24×
- Stephens v. FausSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1906-02-14· cited 14×
- Mettel v. GalesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-03-02· cited 10×
- Sucker State Drill Co. v. BrockNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1908-11-20· cited 8×
- Dyea Electric Light Co. v. EastonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1901-05-04· cited 5×
- Bright v. JuhlSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1903-02-04· cited 5×
- Yeomans v. LambertonIdaho Supreme Court· 1917-01-17· cited 3×
- Bank of Iowa & Dakota v. OliverSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1899-04-04· cited 3×
- Neeley v. RobertsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1899-09-02· cited 3×
- Hughes v. StearnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1900-11-21· cited 1×
- Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. ZickrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1910-05-24· cited 1×
- Nepper v. WordehoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1919-07-22· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rubber Company v. GoodyearSupreme Court· 1868-02-17· cited 36×
- Coon v. Grand Lodge of the United Order of Honor of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-05-31· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Morgan v. LammSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1896-12-23· cited 14×
- Coburn v. Board of Com'rsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-04-05· cited 8×
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. SkauSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-05-17· cited 8×
- Sinkling v. Illinois Central Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-04-05· cited 7×
- Smith v. HawleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1899-02-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.