Martin v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• from the standpoint of the description requirement, “the disclosure requirements of the first paragraph of § 112 [must be] met with respect to the subject matter now claimed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ralston Purina Company v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1985-09-19· cited 152×
• Wagoner v. Barger
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1972-08-24· cited 27×
• In re Davies
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-04-05· cited 22×
• Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, S.p.A.
  Third Circuit· 1981-10-14· cited 17×
• Weil v. Fritz
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-01-26· cited 15×
• Snitzer v. Etzel
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1972-09-14· cited 14×
• In re Eynde
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-07-19· cited 12×
• S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1985-03-15· cited 11×
• Eric C. Bigham v. Wagn O. Godtfredsen
  Federal Circuit· 1988-09-21· cited 9×
• In re Van Langenhoven
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1972-04-20· cited 8×
• Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
  D. Delaware· 1989-06-30· cited 5×
• In re Brebner
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1972-03-23· cited 5×
• Hirschfeld v. Banner
  District of Columbia· 1978-11-20· cited 4×
• In re Gaubert
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1975-11-13· cited 2×
• Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. Montedison
  Third Circuit· 1981-10-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Application of Eric D. Brown
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1964-06-02· cited 46×
• Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. Spurlin
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-05-27· cited 46×
• Application of Roland Ralph Dileone and Howard Robert Lucas
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-02-11· cited 29×
• Application of Arthur H. Ahlbrecht
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-04-08· cited 26×
• Thomas Lynn Fields v. Lloyd H. Conover and Robert B. Woodward
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-07-01· cited 20×
• Application of Karl Folkers and Clifford H. Shunk
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1965-05-06· cited 19×
• Application of George B. Karnofsky
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1968-03-07· cited 9×
• Application of Paul v. Brower and John F. Fuzek
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1970-11-25· cited 9×
• Application of Roland Ralph Dileone
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1971-02-11· cited 7×
• Davis v. Joe Ward Construction Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1966-11-05· cited 2×