Skip to main content
· 9/14/1972

Snitzer v. Etzel

Citations

  • 59 C.C.P.A. 1242
  • 465 F.2d 899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering that the wife did not rely on minimal spousal support award in light of income from the sale of marital property at the time of dissolution and her share of contract payments from the sale of a lumber mill, as well as her unencumbered ownership of a house and unimproved lots

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Almond, Baldwin, Lane, Rich, Rosenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.