Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2/19/2002

Martin v. Flanagan

Citations

259 Conn. 487
789 A.2d 979
2002 Conn. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that holding plaintiff in error in contempt improper when he had validly invoked privilege against self-incrimination
concluding that trial court’s determination that Carlton Martin could not invoke privilege at defendant’s trial was improper
setting forth details involving Carlton Martin’s invocation of privilege against self-incrimination while being questioned outside presence of jury at defendant’s trial
noting that the weight of authority allows a witness whose conviction has not been finalized on direct appeal to invoke the privilege and to refuse to testify about the subject matter that formed the basis of his or hereonviection and collecting cases
noting that the weight of authority allows a witness whose conviction has not been finalized on direct appeal to invoke the privilege and to refuse to testify about the subject matter that formed the basis of his or her conviction and collecting cases
listing state and federal cases in support of proposition that the privilege may be invoked by a witness “whose conviction has not been finalized on direct appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Martin v. Flanagan

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.