N.D. California· 4/7/1994
Martin v. Dahlberg, Inc.
Citations
- 156 F.R.D. 207
- 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 340
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10056
- 1994 WL 383148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that federal RICO claims were “the only basis for federal jurisdiction in this action”
- finding that common law claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation raise individualized questions of reliance precluding class certification on these claims
- “This Court generally presumes that California law will apply unless defendants demonstrate conclusively that the laws of the other states will apply”
- finding no evidence of a “fixed set of written materials”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationD. New Jersey· 1997-03-17· cited 180×
- Sanders v. Apple Inc.N.D. California· 2009-01-21· cited 81×
- Buford v. H & R Block, Inc.S.D. Georgia· 1996-07-11· cited 67×
- Rohlfing v. Manor Care, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1997-03-28· cited 60×
- Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Products Inc.N.D. California· 2010-02-16· cited 44×
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.C.D. California· 2012-06-12· cited 43×
- In re Cooper Companies Inc. Securities LitigationC.D. California· 2009-01-05· cited 33×
- Rothwell v. Chubb Life Insurance Co. of AmericaD. New Hampshire· 1998-03-31· cited 29×
- In Re Woodward & Lothrop Holdings, Inc.S.D. New York· 1997-02-11· cited 21×
- Lobo Exploration Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1999-05-28· cited 16×
- Swartz v. KPMG, LLCW.D. Washington· 2004-02-13· cited 11×
- Marquis v. Tecumseh Products Co.E.D. Michigan· 2002-03-20· cited 11×
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Dahlberg, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-20· cited 7×
- Hasken v. City of LouisvilleW.D. Kentucky· 2003-02-11· cited 6×
- In Re Ford Motor Co. Ignition Switch Products Liability LitigationD. New Jersey· 1999-03-01· cited 5×
- Ruffu v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.E.D. Texas· 1998-07-24· cited 5×
- De La Riva v. Houlihan Smith & Co.N.D. Illinois· 2012-03-02· cited 3×
- Fischler v. AmSouth Corp.M.D. Florida· 1997-09-22· cited 3×
- Szabo v. Bridgeport Machines, Inc.N.D. Indiana· 2001-01-12· cited 1×
- Rothwell v. ChubbD. New Hampshire· 1998-03-31
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.