Skip to main content
· 3/20/2002

Marquis v. Tecumseh Products Co.

Citations

  • 206 F.R.D. 132
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4776
  • 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815
  • 2002 WL 448412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting party’s request to depose opposing counsel and finding “much, if not all, of the information defendants claim to be seeking can be acquired from [the defendant] himself and/or representatives of [the plaintiff]” (collecting cases)
  • fact that individual acted as counsel in matters on which discovery was sought weighed in favor of prohibiting deposition
  • licensor’s attorney acted as counsel to licensor, and not a fact witness, in licensor’s trademark infringement and breach of contract action arising out of termination of licensing agreement
  • motion to quash subpoena of plaintiff’s trial attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.