Martin v. Allstate Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding deposition inquiries about document retention policy were overbroad and irrelevant where requesting party merely speculated that requested documents had been withheld
• denying discovery into search methods where no evidence supported claims of missing documents
• “The deposition of a corporation through its agents or officers is normally taken at the corporation’s principal place of business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Andrew R. Flanders v. DiMarzio, Inc.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2020-06-12

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford-El v. Britton
  Supreme Court· 1998-05-04· cited 2,583×
• Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-19· cited 2,321×
• Lee v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 2009-06-30· cited 585×
• Quantum Chemical Corp. v. Toennies
  Texas Supreme Court· 2001-05-24· cited 495×
• Okoye v. University of Texas Houston Health Science Center
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-04-03· cited 411×
• Moss v. BMC Software, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-07-02· cited 270×
• Carol Vaughn v. Woodforest Bank
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-12-21· cited 175×
• Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance Plan
  Tenth Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 131×
• Thomas Turner v. Kansas City Southern Railway
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-03-23· cited 114×
• Laura Jepsen v. Florida Board of Regents
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-02-06· cited 42×
• Resolution Trust Corp. v. Worldwide Insurance Management Corp.
  N.D. Texas· 1992-12-08· cited 12×

Other cases named Martin v. Allstate Insurance

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Martin v. Allstate Insurance
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-13· cited 1×