N.D. Texas· 4/4/2013
Martin v. Allstate Insurance
Citations
- 292 F.R.D. 361
- 2013 WL 1352070
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50675
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding deposition inquiries about document retention policy were overbroad and irrelevant where requesting party merely speculated that requested documents had been withheld
- denying discovery into search methods where no evidence supported claims of missing documents
- “The deposition of a corporation through its agents or officers is normally taken at the corporation’s principal place of business.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Martin v. Allstate Insurance
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.