MARTIN
Citations
- 23 I. & N. Dec. 491
Syllabus
MARTIN, 23 I&N Dec. 491 (BIA 2002) (Reposted due to editorial change) ID 3481 (PDF) The offense of third-degree assault in violation of section 53a-61(a)(1) of the Connecticut General Statutes, which involves the intentional infliction of physical injury upon another, is a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a) (2000) and is therefore an aggravated felony under section 101(a)(43)(F) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) (2000).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing legislative history showing that Congress intended to include a “threatened or attempted simple assault or battery” in the definition of a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a)
- deeming circuit court decisions to be “authoritative” precedent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jose Ernesto Flores v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2003-11-26· cited 142×
- Jaroslaw Chrzanoski 1 v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralSecond Circuit· 2003-04-22· cited 101×
- ASSAADBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2003-07-01· cited 71×
- BRIEVABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2005-07-01· cited 52×
- Dalip Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-10-21· cited 49×
- Whyte v. LynchFirst Circuit· 2015-12-09· cited 31×
- VELASQUEZBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2010-07-01· cited 15×
- GUZMAN-POLANCOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2016-07-01· cited 6×
- Villanueva v. Holder, Jr.First Circuit· 2015-04-24· cited 5×
Cites
80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 2,564×
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 2,234×
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 1,608×
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 1,491×
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 876×
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 854×
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1982-04-05· cited 841×
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court· 1999-01-25· cited 798×
- Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 719×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.