Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 893 N.E.2d 1170
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 2121
  • 2008 WL 4405319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where “repeated molestations . . . fell within the respective time periods outlined in the charging information . . . the evidence . . . was presented as direct evidence of the charged molestations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Friedlander, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.