Marsh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court was required to conduct hearing on defendant's motion for postconviction DNA testing after the state denied having any physical evidence suitable for DNA testing
• if state's response creates a factual dispute, trial court should conduct evidentiary hearing to resolve it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blake v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 82×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-19· cited 4×
• Spaziano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-09· cited 3×
• Jordan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-07· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Borland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-16· cited 13×