Skip to main content

Borland v. State

Citations

  • 848 So. 2d 1288
  • 2003 WL 21654408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if state's response to defendant's rule 3.853 motion creates a factual dispute, the trial court should hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve that dispute
  • holding that if the state's response to defendant's motion for DNA testing creates a factual dispute, the trial court should conduct an evidentiary hearing to resolve that dispute
  • where the defendant’s rule 3.853 motion alleged evidence still existed for DNA testing, and the state filed an unsworn response alleging such evidence did not exist, a factual dispute existed which had to be resolved by an evidentiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.