Court of Appeals of Georgia· 9/5/1989
Marlow v. State
Citations
- 192 Ga. App. 670
- 385 S.E.2d 759
- 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1093
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant cannot show prejudice resulting from introduction of hearsay testimony when “[s]ubstantially the same evidence was introduced another way”
- defendant cannot show prejudice resulting from introduction of hearsay testimony when “[s]ubstantially the same evidence was introduced another way”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beasley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Momon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-09-08· cited 197×
- Teague v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1984-05-01· cited 162×
- Walraven v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-11-23· cited 115×
- Satterfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-01-14· cited 76×
- Ledesma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-09-07· cited 38×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1981-11-13· cited 30×
- Eady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-03-20· cited 26×
- McGinnis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-10-20· cited 19×
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-04-13· cited 17×
- Spaulding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-02-02· cited 15×
- Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-05-11· cited 10×
- Tarver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-04-25· cited 9×
- Wesley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-02-19· cited 6×
- Hampton v. THE STATECourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-06-22· cited 5×
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-10-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.