Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 10/23/2018

Mark Silguero v. CSL Plasma, Incorporated

Citations

  • 907 F.3d 323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plasma collection center is not a \service establishment\ and therefore does not fall under the ADA's definition of \public accommodation\
  • “[C]ourts have often determined that . . . independent contractors are not protected by Title I of the ADA.” (citations omitted)
  • “Title I [of the ADA] protects only ‘employees’ . . . courts have often determined that . . . independent contractors are not protected by Title I of the ADA.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Elrod, Haynes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.